1 files changed, 0 insertions, 92 deletions
diff --git a/tnslc/syntax-playground.tnsl b/tnslc/syntax-playground.tnsl
deleted file mode 100644
index 651be62..0000000
--- a/tnslc/syntax-playground.tnsl
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,92 +0,0 @@
-# This file is for playing with syntax and seeing what works and what does not.
-
-
-## TEST 1 - newlines seperate statements, not ;
-## newlines can be escaped with \
-
-/; test1
-    int main = 0
-
-    /; loop (int i = 0, i < 5) [i++]
-        tnsl.io.println("Hi!")
-    ;/
-
-    String str = {}
-
-    /; loop (char j = ' ', j != 'k') \
-            [j++]
-        
-        str.append(j)
-    ;/
-
-    tnsl.io.println(str)
-
-    return main
-;/
-
-## END TEST 1
-##
-## Thoughts: this is much better.
-
-## TEST 2 - get '.' augment auto de-references pointers
-
-struct a {
-    int i, j
-}
-
-struct b {
-    String str,
-    ~a ints
-}
-
-/; ptr_test1 
-    b str_b = {"Hello", {0, 1}}
-    
-    ~b ptr_b = ~str_b
-
-    tnsl.io.println(ptr_b.str)
-    # vs
-    tnsl.io.println(ptr_b`.str)
-    # both work
-
-    ptr_b.ints.i = 12
-    ptr_b.ints.j = ptr_b.ints.i / 4
-    # vs
-    ptr_b`.ints`.i = 12
-    ptr_b`.ints`.j = ptr_b`.ints`.i / 4
-    # Again, the second one is more descriptive, but is it better?
-
-    ptr_call(ptr_b)
-    ref_call(ptr_b)
-;/
-
-/; ptr_call (~b ptr)
-    ptr.ints.i = 8
-;/
-
-/; ref_call (b` ref)
-    ref.ints.j = 9
-;/
-
-## END TEST 2
-##
-## Thoughts: not sure, the . operator could become a little too ambiguous if this is added
-
-## Test 3: using [] for array indexing instead of {}
-
-:include "tnsl"
-:using "tnsl"
-
-/; main ({}String args) [int]
-    int i = len args
-    String first = args[0]
-
-    {}int list = {0, 1, 2, 3}
-    i = list[2]
-
-    return i
-;/
-
-## End test 3
-##
-## Thoughts: I'm not sure weather I like it better or not.