diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tnslc/tests')
| -rw-r--r-- | tnslc/tests/proper_calling.tnsl | 21 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tnslc/tests/syntax-playground.tnsl | 92 |
2 files changed, 113 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tnslc/tests/proper_calling.tnsl b/tnslc/tests/proper_calling.tnsl new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6fd5e69 --- /dev/null +++ b/tnslc/tests/proper_calling.tnsl @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +struct CallMe { + int a, b +} + +/; method CallMe + /; call_two (int a, b) [int] + return a + b + self.a + self.b + ;/ + + /; call_four (int a, b, c, d) [int] + return self.call_two(a + b, b * c + d) + self.call_two(a * b + c, c + d) + ;/ + +;/ + +/; main [int] + CallMe cm + cm.a = 0 + cm.b = 0 + return cm.call_four(0, 2, 2, 0) +;/
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tnslc/tests/syntax-playground.tnsl b/tnslc/tests/syntax-playground.tnsl new file mode 100644 index 0000000..651be62 --- /dev/null +++ b/tnslc/tests/syntax-playground.tnsl @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ +# This file is for playing with syntax and seeing what works and what does not. + + +## TEST 1 - newlines seperate statements, not ; +## newlines can be escaped with \ + +/; test1 + int main = 0 + + /; loop (int i = 0, i < 5) [i++] + tnsl.io.println("Hi!") + ;/ + + String str = {} + + /; loop (char j = ' ', j != 'k') \ + [j++] + + str.append(j) + ;/ + + tnsl.io.println(str) + + return main +;/ + +## END TEST 1 +## +## Thoughts: this is much better. + +## TEST 2 - get '.' augment auto de-references pointers + +struct a { + int i, j +} + +struct b { + String str, + ~a ints +} + +/; ptr_test1 + b str_b = {"Hello", {0, 1}} + + ~b ptr_b = ~str_b + + tnsl.io.println(ptr_b.str) + # vs + tnsl.io.println(ptr_b`.str) + # both work + + ptr_b.ints.i = 12 + ptr_b.ints.j = ptr_b.ints.i / 4 + # vs + ptr_b`.ints`.i = 12 + ptr_b`.ints`.j = ptr_b`.ints`.i / 4 + # Again, the second one is more descriptive, but is it better? + + ptr_call(ptr_b) + ref_call(ptr_b) +;/ + +/; ptr_call (~b ptr) + ptr.ints.i = 8 +;/ + +/; ref_call (b` ref) + ref.ints.j = 9 +;/ + +## END TEST 2 +## +## Thoughts: not sure, the . operator could become a little too ambiguous if this is added + +## Test 3: using [] for array indexing instead of {} + +:include "tnsl" +:using "tnsl" + +/; main ({}String args) [int] + int i = len args + String first = args[0] + + {}int list = {0, 1, 2, 3} + i = list[2] + + return i +;/ + +## End test 3 +## +## Thoughts: I'm not sure weather I like it better or not. |